CathLab Digest


Digital Edition

DIGITAL EDITION

Interactive BONUS content delivered to your email

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE »





CLINICAL EVENTS CALENDAR

  • Start
    Jul 15,2010
    End
    Jul 17,2010
    Third Annual Cardiovascular Interventions: Head-to-Toe Meeting: Napa Valley, CA
    http://www.h2tmeeting.org/
  • Start
    Jul 18,2010
    End
    Jul 18,2010
    Super Tech Course for CSI (Diamondback): Hands-on, presented by Orlando Marrero, RCIS, MBA, Winter Haven Hospital, FL
    Orlando.Marrero@WinterHavenHospital.org
  • Start
    Jul 18,2010
    End
    Jul 21,2010
    Pediatric & Adult Interventional Cardiac Symposium With Live Case Demonstrations: Sheraton Hotel & Towers, Chicago, IL
    http://www.picsymposium.com
  • Start
    Jul 19,2010
    End
    Jul 23,2010
    Hawaii 2010: Principles and Perspectives in Interventional Cardiology
    www.hawaiippic.com

A Refresher on Pressure


Blog By: Jon E. Jenkins RN RCIS

Jon E. Jenkins RN RCIS's picture
JenkinsBlogpic2.jpg
Click to Enlarge Images


In the era of vascular closure devices, the skill of achieving hemostasis by manual compression is almost becoming a lost art. It concerns me to see cath lab personnel that do not have a good technique for manual compression. When those closure devices fail, we need to be confident in our ability to manage hemostasis. Most seem to go with the "brute force" or "monster mash" technique. While this can be effective, it presents some concerns.

First, a "brute force" or "monster mash" technique is more uncomfortable for the patient. Second, it tends to cause more bruising and displaces the skin is a way that makes it difficult to assess if a hematoma is developing. Third, this technique is often not effective in our "well nourished" patients (specifically those with a tight, round belly). Finally, it is physically more demanding on the staff and often leads to the excuse "I'm just not strong enough to hold pressure," requiring calling upon your second hand to assist.

I learned manual compression in the days before closure devices, when we used 8, 9, and 10 French sheaths for interventions. Not to mention the patients often received 10-15,000 units of heparin during the procedure. So 40 minutes of manual compression was not uncommon. You quickly learn how to "efficiently" pull a sheath. On top of that, I had a physician who taught by "negative or humble" reinforcement, so when I was learning and had difficulty getting control of the bleeding, he would walk over and use one finger to achieve hemostasis. For me, it was a shot to the ego, but more importantly, taught me that technique is the key, not strength.

I want to briefly share a few refreshers on manual pressure. Once again, I am pushing the notion that you must think about the process. In your mind, walk through the steps and understand what you are doing. It sounds simple, and if you understand the anatomy and what is being done with the needle and sheath, it all makes sense. When something makes sense, your confidence and technique improve.

1. Consider patient size and the depth of the tissue tract between skin level and the artery. The "classic" instruction was to hold about two finger widths above the skin entry site, but as our population is getting larger, this is not adequate. Think about it. If the typical angle of entry for the access needle is 45 degrees, then the puncture site of the artery is going to vary greatly, depending on the depth of the tissue tract. In a very lean person, you could literally hold right at the skin entry, but take on a large patient and the actual puncture can be a couple of inches above the skin entry site. The thicker the tissue tract, the higher the hold site.

2. Locate the artery! I see many folks just hold "above" the sheath, but as we know, sometimes the skin entry can be well medial or lateral to the actual arterial puncture. Tip: If it is a difficult artery to palpate, apply pressure where you think the artery is and very slowly start pulling the sheath. You should be able to feel the sheath under your fingers. If you feel the sheath, it's got to be over the artery.

3. Fingertips, not all fingers or whole hand. It is much easier to compress a small amount of tissue than a large amount! If you use your whole hand (I've even seen fists used), you are trying to compress a large area of tissue. Try it on a piece of memory foam. Use a couple of fingers and compress it as deeply as you can, then try with your whole fist. You can get much deeper into the foam with your fingertips, rather than your fist. Fingertips allow you to apply very specific, directed pressure to a site. Using your whole hand is just spreading pressure over the area. Truthfully, many times you can pull a sheath and obtain hemostasis with one finger if the artery is located correctly.

4. Consider sheath size and thrombus-altering medications. The bigger the hole, the longer the hold. Heparin, clopidogrel (Plavix), eptifibatide (Integrilin), aspirin, bivalirudin (Angiomax), etc., are all going to affect when and how long you have to hold. Most facilities have protocols for hold times, so please check with yours, but we say for any patient with ACT < 170 and with bivalirudin having been off for at least two hours that you are at 3 minutes for every sheath French size. For example, a 5 French sheath is a 15-minute hold.

5. Don't move your fingers around and only switch hands if you absolutely must. This helps with patient comfort and hemostasis. It has been a very long time since I have had a patient vagal during sheath removal. One reason, I believe, is that repositioning can cause discomfort in our patients. The initial compression often does cause discomfort, but if you will hold steady, the patient will be able to relax.

6. NO PEEKING! Do not let up on the artery to see if it stopped bleeding until your hold time is complete. All your work until then can be reverted back to the beginning. If it is a 15-minute hold, then hold 15 minutes until letting up.

7. Don't let up suddenly. The sudden rush of pressure and blood to the arterial access site can open the site back up. As you begin to let off compression, do it slowly.

Certainly there is more to it that this brief blog can cover. The best way to improve your technique is by pulling sheaths. If you have to pull 10-12 sheaths a day, you will develop an efficient method. We had a couple of female techs back in the day that were very petite and couldn't have weighed more that 100 lbs soaking wet.......they could pull sheaths all day. Was it strength that allowed them to do it, or a good understanding of technique?

We need to focus on this in our cath labs in order to provide better care and better comfort for our patients if a manual method of hemostasis is used.

What are some tips you all have?

Posted by Anonymous on March 3, 2010 at 4:03 pm

great tips Jon. It is indeed a lost art. I also feel that those looking after patients who have had sheaths removed are often poorly trained and have never even removed one themselves. Surely this is a recipe for disaster.

Posted by Anonymous on March 3, 2010 at 5:03 pm

2 last important tips-
1. Never occlude the artery for more than 3 minutes total.
2. When instructing people or checking on their technique, palpating the distal pedal pulses can guide the "holder" as to the depth of compression. After 3 minutes of no pulse, I as the pedal pulse checker should be able to palpate a weak pulse, indicating distal flow, aiding in clot formation.

Terry Leonard, RN, BSN, CCRN, Unit Educator @Stony Brook University Medical Center.

Posted by Anonymous on March 12, 2010 at 10:03 am

Always make sure the patient has an empty bladder before sheath removal.

Posted by Anonymous on March 12, 2010 at 3:03 pm

What cathlab will let a staff member stand their for 30 min to hold pressure.

Posted by Anonymous on April 5, 2010 at 12:04 pm

Hi Jon- Excellent review of the dying art of manual compression. I am writing a article on groin hemostatsis and love your style. I would love to include your blog review in the article with your permission.
Char shellenberger RN, RCIS
Clinical Education Specialist at Healthworks Inc
charshellenberger@yahoo.com
443-880-1966

Posted by Anonymous on April 6, 2010 at 10:04 pm

Great Refresher!!! Thank you I plan to share this with my staff at Mercy Health. I to recieved that humbling shot to the ego with the one finger technique. The memory foam is perfect analogy for describing the correct pressure. That backs the demstration that we where taught by Dr. Inlow. Thanks, Ragain Chapman RN,LT,RCIS

Posted by Anonymous on April 16, 2010 at 11:04 am

I am trying to find out if there is a standard regarding
femoral arterial sheaths--Specificaly do they need to have a
pressurized system attached post cath until removal. If not is there a specific time frame in which I should remove sheath.
Thanks,

Ann Turner RN, MSN, CCRN
Clinical Specialist/Educator
Peninsula Regional Medical Center
Salisbury Maryland

Posted by Anonymous on May 14, 2010 at 4:05 pm

Quote “Posted by Anonymous on March 12, 2010 at 3:03 pm
What cathlab will let a staff member stand there for 30 min to hold pressure?"

I work in a small hospital in NE Missouri and we have three Cath Lab techs. Our supervisor (our boss) is an RN and will only let the tech hold manual pressure. We are also the only ones who scrub. My Cath Lab is never opposed to let us hold pressure forever because that is what they did in 1912 and that is what we will keep doing. Why look outside the box?

Ryan RT(R), BA
Hannibal, MO

Posted by Anonymous on May 25, 2010 at 9:05 am

Fantastic article, Jon.

Truthfully, I have enjoyed all of your blogs and look forward to many more.

I earn a living out here on the West Coast teaching groin management and reinforcing good technique. It is often challenging to break bad habits and de-mystify the art of hemostasis.

I was wondering if I could print your article and share it with the various people that I train? It is full of excellent information. More importantly, I think that better standardizing sheath pulling protocols and groin management would optimize the outcomes, don't you?

Keep up the great work!
Susan Sions RN, RCIS
Orange County, CA

Posted by admin on May 25, 2010 at 1:05 pm

Susan, please feel free to print out the article and share it. For educational purposes, that's not a problem. Thank you!

Best regards,
Rebecca Kapur
Managing Editor, Cath Lab Digest
rkapur@hmpcommunications.com

Posted by Anonymous on June 3, 2010 at 1:06 pm

As we review the proper way to manage sheaths, there is one factor that has not been addressed. Our Lab staffs are aging, and arthritis in hands and wrists make it very difficult to hold pressure for 15-30 mins. Any suggestions?

Posted by Anonymous on June 9, 2010 at 1:06 pm

Jon I enjoyed your blog and plan to use many your suggestions. It's amazing some of the Inlow lessens that we forget over the years.
Willie

Posted by Anonymous on June 15, 2010 at 11:06 am

My hospital is starting a cath lab next year and they showed us the compressor (femostop like device- anybody want to share thier experiences- I wasn't overly impressed. Great article and will used ( with permission) in my hemostasis cless. Knew alot of mashers.
Vicki Clavir RN
California Hospital Medical Ctr
LA, Calif

Posted by Anonymous on June 29, 2010 at 9:06 pm

Regarding the compressor: this device is only as effective as 1) the person that applies it AND 2) the patient's "physique" in the area applied and their lacking desire to move.
Presuming the placement is correct, the bounding lower belly morphology most heart patients have predispose the disk to sliding down and away from the arteriotomy location. This may be lessened (but not eliminated in most cases) by taping the pannus superior and contralateral to the sheath site. Additionally, any patient movement (say, for purposes of comfort), can displace the position of the disk.

The inherent problem with a device such as this is the tendency to walk away and expect it to perform the same as when it is being watched over.
Was the device placed occlusively and forgotten?
Has the disk position retained its original placement?
Is it being backed off gradually at the appropriate intervals?
It's easy to put something functional into place, only to see it fail later because we forget to stay attentive to it.

RoBx

Posted by Anonymous on July 4, 2010 at 5:07 am

Pulling arterial sheaths is always a great topic. Earlier in my career, an interventional radiologist had us:
1. position our fingers above the puncture site.
2. cover the sheath with a guaze
3. remove sheath allowing small bleed back into the gauze.
4. hold enough occlusive pressure to stop bleeding.
5. keep puncture site in view, not hiding it with bunch of 4x4s

We were performing valvuloplasty it even worked pretty good in that scenario. Another trick was with a morbid obese patient.... to frog leg the patient. Have patient turn knee outward, slide ankle up the stretcher a few inches. This gives you a pretty good platform to go after the more difficult sheath sites or help gain control of one you have lost.

Doug Langager, RCIS
WVUE-City Hospital
Martinsburg, WV

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br><h1><h2><h3><i><b>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options






RSS Feeds

Cath Lab Surveys

Center for Education & Practice Development - Learning Module Femoral Artery Sheath Management(PDF) This learning module is designed for the Registered Nurse Division 1 working in areas where
patients are undergoing percutaneous cardiac catheterisation and interventions.

All Subscriptions are FREE to qualified cardiology professionals

#

  • Subscribe to:
  • Journal
  • Digital Journal
  • E-News
  • RSS feed

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE »


Newly Revised and Updated for 2009!

practical EP





Surgical Site Infection Education

REVIEW OUR OTHER
CARDIOLOGY BRANDS

Check out our other resources for healthcare professionals of all specialties.

  • EP Lab Digest
  • Invasive Cardiology
  • Vascular Disease Management

Google Analytics Alternative